Well, it looks like Black folks are beginning to do just that. Check out this latest poll.
Thursday, March 20, 2008
How should Black Folks Vote Come November, Pt 2
In my last post I made the argument that if Obama dosen't win the Democratic nomination we shouldn't vote in November. We should instead vote for someone like Nader or better yet Cynnthia McKinney. This make either of these candidates a viable third party candidate next election cycle and would send a strong message to the Dumbocrats that you can't take us for granted anymore.
Wednesday, March 12, 2008
How Should Blacks Folk Vote Come November Pt I?
I was thinking about this last night while watching the coverage of the Mississippi returns. They did their usually break down of exit polls, and then the topic of race baiting came up. We all know that Hillary, Bill, and a lot of people in her campaign have played this game. Fine. That's polictics. It's down and dirty stuff. The Clintons are trying to make Obama the black candidate, and take the white male vote. If they can do that they may have a shot against him. However, that's just the set-up to what I really want to talk to about.
Let's say Hillary gets the nod. It's her vs. McCain in the fall. The dumbocrats (to borrow a phrase from the Field-Negro), think that blacks vote will forgive Hillary and vote democrat in the fall. That's what we've always done. They know we can't stand rethuglicans (This is also another Field term), and wont vote for them. The question I have is should we vote at all?
Hillary has played the same race baiting politics that the rethuglicans have. The Dumbocrats have shown that they will not stand up to Bush or the rethuglicans in congress. So, why should we expect things to change that much under Hillary? She is a part of the Machine. A very intergral part of the machine.
We have heard for a long time that the dumbocrats just take our votes for granted. They do. We, as a people, should not just give them our vote. However, we don't have a lot of options. Like I said, unless your Larry Elder, Armstrong Williams, or somebody like that we're are not going to vote for a rethuglican. With all of that said I'm leaning toward the idea we shouldn't vote at all.
Yeah, that's right. I'm serious leaning toward the fact we shouldn't vote at all. Hillary can't win the whitehouse without us. McCain can. I know not voting will give the election to McCain, but honestly does it matter? Has democrats really done a lot for Black folks? The only time they talk about our needs is right before the election. Then they almost never follow through.
If Obama doesn't get the nod we should stay home. We should send a clear signal to the dumbocrats, that we will not take politics as usual, and you will listen to us. Yeah, I know that means 4 more years of Bush style politics. However, like I said before, shit doesn't change for black folks no matter who is in office. Do you really think with all of the race baiting that Hillary will be a friend to the negro? How does that work? "I was just calling you guys niggers in front of my white friends so they think I'm one of you. As soon as I get in I'll take care of you guys. Promise"
What do you gusy think?
Let's say Hillary gets the nod. It's her vs. McCain in the fall. The dumbocrats (to borrow a phrase from the Field-Negro), think that blacks vote will forgive Hillary and vote democrat in the fall. That's what we've always done. They know we can't stand rethuglicans (This is also another Field term), and wont vote for them. The question I have is should we vote at all?
Hillary has played the same race baiting politics that the rethuglicans have. The Dumbocrats have shown that they will not stand up to Bush or the rethuglicans in congress. So, why should we expect things to change that much under Hillary? She is a part of the Machine. A very intergral part of the machine.
We have heard for a long time that the dumbocrats just take our votes for granted. They do. We, as a people, should not just give them our vote. However, we don't have a lot of options. Like I said, unless your Larry Elder, Armstrong Williams, or somebody like that we're are not going to vote for a rethuglican. With all of that said I'm leaning toward the idea we shouldn't vote at all.
Yeah, that's right. I'm serious leaning toward the fact we shouldn't vote at all. Hillary can't win the whitehouse without us. McCain can. I know not voting will give the election to McCain, but honestly does it matter? Has democrats really done a lot for Black folks? The only time they talk about our needs is right before the election. Then they almost never follow through.
If Obama doesn't get the nod we should stay home. We should send a clear signal to the dumbocrats, that we will not take politics as usual, and you will listen to us. Yeah, I know that means 4 more years of Bush style politics. However, like I said before, shit doesn't change for black folks no matter who is in office. Do you really think with all of the race baiting that Hillary will be a friend to the negro? How does that work? "I was just calling you guys niggers in front of my white friends so they think I'm one of you. As soon as I get in I'll take care of you guys. Promise"
What do you gusy think?
Tuesday, March 4, 2008
What Should Obama do?
As I watch the democratic primaries unfold, and the Clinton/McCain attack machines rev up I have a serious question for Obama. Can he or will he fight back? Will he take the high road like Kerry and Gore or will he come out swinging? The media has already started to get behind Hillary. The right-wing attack machine has already started to tear down Obama.
I think he will try to counter everything they say and turn it back on them. When Hillary ran that 3 o’clock ad Obama had a response in less that 15 mins. Unfortunately, Obama is getting the media attention that he is use to. That means most networks aired Hillary’s ad, but not Obama’s response. To Obama’s credit he is still doing an outstanding job of campaigning. Even with facing the Clinton democratic machine and the republican attack machine he has managed to whittle her 20 point lead in Texas and Ohio to either dead even or she has slight lead.
Even if he does counter everything they say I don’t think it will be enough. The media from both the left and the right don’t want to see Obama win. The GOP doesn’t want him to win because he poses the greatest threat to McCain. The left leaning national media (maybe except MSNBC) is in Clintons camp. She represents business as usual and is the business folk find her comfortable and predictable.
From here on out Obama needs to attack his foes both left and right, but not appear like he is attacking. If he attacks Hillary too harshly he will be ridiculed for being a mean black guy attacking a poor defenseless white women. He attacks McCain to hard he’s attacking an old white war vet you can do know wrong. What is Obama to do?
I think he’s doing a great job of counter attacking the Clintons and McCain. However, he is going to need to get more traction. He needs to use the greatest weapon he has (besides the stump speech), the Internet. That Will I Am video spread like wild fire over the net. I think if he needs to start e-mailing as many people as possible the “truths” on Hillary and McCain. However, he needs to do it in a way that doesn’t connect his campaign to the e-mail attacks. I suggest starting a dummy e-mail account and let it fly. Start with a couple of students and make that stuff viral. It doesn’t have to be nasty. Just enough to bring the facts to light. Call both of them out.
I would follow this up with more of the same positive commercials that he has been running on TV. However, I would still take a jab or 2, and counter everything they say about me while at the same time casting even more doubt on them. I would paint McCain as a flip-flopper. This shouldn’t be to hard to do. I would also stick him with the tag of Bush 3. That also shouldn’t be that hard.
Hillary is a little bit different. I would swiftboat her quick. I would run that CNN press conference of her supporting Nafta then come right back with her at the debate denouncing it. I would also press her on those tax returns every chance I get. I would also hit her with the votes on the credit card bill that made it impossible for people to declare bankruptcy. But that’s just me.
I think he will try to counter everything they say and turn it back on them. When Hillary ran that 3 o’clock ad Obama had a response in less that 15 mins. Unfortunately, Obama is getting the media attention that he is use to. That means most networks aired Hillary’s ad, but not Obama’s response. To Obama’s credit he is still doing an outstanding job of campaigning. Even with facing the Clinton democratic machine and the republican attack machine he has managed to whittle her 20 point lead in Texas and Ohio to either dead even or she has slight lead.
Even if he does counter everything they say I don’t think it will be enough. The media from both the left and the right don’t want to see Obama win. The GOP doesn’t want him to win because he poses the greatest threat to McCain. The left leaning national media (maybe except MSNBC) is in Clintons camp. She represents business as usual and is the business folk find her comfortable and predictable.
From here on out Obama needs to attack his foes both left and right, but not appear like he is attacking. If he attacks Hillary too harshly he will be ridiculed for being a mean black guy attacking a poor defenseless white women. He attacks McCain to hard he’s attacking an old white war vet you can do know wrong. What is Obama to do?
I think he’s doing a great job of counter attacking the Clintons and McCain. However, he is going to need to get more traction. He needs to use the greatest weapon he has (besides the stump speech), the Internet. That Will I Am video spread like wild fire over the net. I think if he needs to start e-mailing as many people as possible the “truths” on Hillary and McCain. However, he needs to do it in a way that doesn’t connect his campaign to the e-mail attacks. I suggest starting a dummy e-mail account and let it fly. Start with a couple of students and make that stuff viral. It doesn’t have to be nasty. Just enough to bring the facts to light. Call both of them out.
I would follow this up with more of the same positive commercials that he has been running on TV. However, I would still take a jab or 2, and counter everything they say about me while at the same time casting even more doubt on them. I would paint McCain as a flip-flopper. This shouldn’t be to hard to do. I would also stick him with the tag of Bush 3. That also shouldn’t be that hard.
Hillary is a little bit different. I would swiftboat her quick. I would run that CNN press conference of her supporting Nafta then come right back with her at the debate denouncing it. I would also press her on those tax returns every chance I get. I would also hit her with the votes on the credit card bill that made it impossible for people to declare bankruptcy. But that’s just me.
Monday, March 3, 2008
Code Words
This is my first installment of Code Words. This is where I will give you a phrase and then break it down to its very last compound.
Code Word: Supply-side Economics.
This is a phrase that you will hear conservatives use all time when discussiong their economic philosophy. What is Supply-side economics, and what does it really mean?
According to Wikipedia Supply-side economics is is a school of macroeconomic thought that argues that economic growth can be most effectively created using incentives for people to produce (supply) goods and services, such as adjusting income tax and capital gains tax rates.
What does it all mean?
Supply-side economics is a fancy way of saying cut taxes on the wealthy and they will (should) invest in the economy and job creation. Basically, trickle-down economics. Does it work? No, not really. We had the largest exspansion of the economy under Bush. Well, that's what the numbers say. If you made over $200,000 you had a good decade. You saw your salary increase, your stock portfolio rise and the whole nine. If you made less than that. Like the other 90% of america you were screwed. Your real wages went down, and the cost of goods and services went up.
You know what? Maybe Supply-side economics worked after all.
Code Word: Supply-side Economics.
This is a phrase that you will hear conservatives use all time when discussiong their economic philosophy. What is Supply-side economics, and what does it really mean?
According to Wikipedia Supply-side economics is is a school of macroeconomic thought that argues that economic growth can be most effectively created using incentives for people to produce (supply) goods and services, such as adjusting income tax and capital gains tax rates.
What does it all mean?
Supply-side economics is a fancy way of saying cut taxes on the wealthy and they will (should) invest in the economy and job creation. Basically, trickle-down economics. Does it work? No, not really. We had the largest exspansion of the economy under Bush. Well, that's what the numbers say. If you made over $200,000 you had a good decade. You saw your salary increase, your stock portfolio rise and the whole nine. If you made less than that. Like the other 90% of america you were screwed. Your real wages went down, and the cost of goods and services went up.
You know what? Maybe Supply-side economics worked after all.
Thursday, February 28, 2008
What happened to these guys?
I was thinking about the Democratic Primary today and everything that has transpired so far. The battle over delegates, battle over super delegates, over states, blacks, hispanics, white guys, women, independents, and the war of words. So far these are some of the more interesting things so far.
1) The number of old time Civil Rights leaders who have sold their souls to the Clintons. Some of these old timers were beaten, hosed, and jailed back in the day for protesting the Man. Now they are trying to convince us that Bill Clinton is black than Obama. What the hell?
2) I was talking with my mom about this number 2 a couple of days ago. That we might actually have a black president. A black president. I never thought I would ever see a black guy even get close to the presidency in my lifetime. Never. My mom feels the same way. We never thought a black man would get this close to the White House. Just wow.
3) Chris Matthews can't stand Hillary. It is so obvious. The anchors on MSNBC love Barack.
4) Speaking of MSNBC, Pat Buchanan is my favorite analysts so far. I don't agree with most of his positions. He just seems the most honest.
5) I'm tired of the primaries. As interesting as they are this is getting old. Just give Obama the nod and let's move on. I want to see how he does against McCain.
Saturday, February 23, 2008
The real art of filmmaking...
I got into a little discussion the other day about what types of movies I like, and the types of movies that I would like to make. This happens quite a bit once people find out I'm in the movie business. Usually when I talk to certain people about the movies I like I don't go into to much detail. I usually give some standard fluff answer about Malcolm X, Star Wars, and throw in a classic or two like Blazing Saddles or the Blues Brothers. Nothing to deep.
I don't tend to give deep answers because these certain people, white business folk, young white folks, old white folk or black folks with big fancy titles might either know somebody that could be a possible funder, or they hold the purse strings themselves. This time I was talking to a young black guy who seemed generally interested in what I know and had to say. So I tried to give him the most honest answer I could.
I told him that if I could I would make movies like Malcolm X, The Spook Who Sat by the Door, Quilombo, or Ganga Zumbi. I want to make powerful black movies. I want to make movies about Marcus Garvey, Nat Turner, Denmark Vessey, the great African empires, Queen Nzinga, and others. Stories that I know are not being told. I want to see the African version of the 300 or Gladiator. A black Star Wars. Those are the movies that I want to make. I would also like to make these movies with a decent budget. That's what I want to do. However, when it comes to getting funding to make movies like these that's another story.
I know I can get funding for some of my projects. I know that if I wanted to make Soul Plane Part 2, The Friday after next week, I'm Still Bout it, or some movie about drug dealers I could find the money. Make a controversial uplifting black movie. Can't find a dime. Hell, even big name actors and directors can't funding for these types of films. Ask Spike Lee about Malcolm X, or Bamboozled. Ask Danny Glover about trying to get a film about Toussaint L'Overture made. They only person giving him money is the president of Venezuela.
I'm not saying that these movies can't be made. They can and they have been. But don't expect to get any kind of distribution or and real financing. Unless you know some down ass rich folks. Don't expect a lot of love from rich black folks either. Especially those with fancy titles. They don't want to be connected to something "radical" that might get them out of good graces with their beloved white friends.
That's why I'm taking the course that am. The Spook who is sitting by the door. I know I might have to make a pseudo "minstrel" film, but I can always slide a couple of my true beliefs in there. Slowly transition from one genre to the other, and save as much money as I can along the way. Eventually, I'll make the movies I want. It's just going to take time.
Tuesday, February 19, 2008
My first Post
Ku Klux Klan Endorses Obama
February 7th, 2008
by James R. Crowe
Anything or anyone is better than Hillary Rodham Clinton
KENTUCKY - USA - Imperial Wizard, Ronald Edwards has stated that, 'anything is better than Hillary Clinton.'
White Christian Supremacist group the Ku Klux Klan has endorsed Barack Obama to be the next President of the United States of America.Speaking from his Kentucky office in Dawson Springs, the Imperial Wizard exclaimed that anything or anyone is better than having that 'crazy ass bitch' as President.This is the first time in Klan history that any member of the KKK has ever publicly supported an African American candidate for the presidency.KKK lodges all over America have been gathering and holding rallies supporting the black presidential candidate.
KKK members in Tennessee rally against Hillary Clinton and support Barack Obama
Grand Turk Cletus Monroe has also been very vocal about the election and has donated thousands of dollars to Obama's election fund.'The boy's gonna do it. My Klan group has donated up to $250,000 to the Obama fund. Anything is better than Hillary Clinton. Hell I'll even adopt a black kid from Africa before I vote for Hillary.''A few years back we were lynching negroes. Now we're gonna vote for one to be president of the US of motherfu**ing A, damn it! Anyone or anything is better than Hillary Clinton - anything!!'Placards for Barack Obama have been put up around the Klan's Headquarters and the KKK have announced a television ad campaign to support the African American candidate
link: http://www.dailysquib.co.uk/?c=117&a=1227
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)